Genetically modified mice are primarily created through two complementary approaches: targeted integration and random DNA integration. Targeted integration precisely inserts or modifies specific genes—often harnessing embryonic stem (ES) cells for large-scale edits or employing CRISPR/Cas tools for faster, cost-effective knockins and knockouts. Meanwhile, random integration typically relies on pronuclear injection or electroporation to insert DNA at unspecified genomic locations, generating transgenic mice that carry markers like LacZ or GFP. Selecting the right strategy depends on the scientific questions you aim to answer and the nature of the genetic alterations you need.
ES cell-targeted models provide site-specific gene integration, making them highly precise. These models are ideal for complex modifications but involve longer development times and higher costs.
Advantage | Limitation |
---|---|
Site-specific integration, ensuring no unintended disruption of endogenous gene function. | Increased time to generate founders due to cell culture and germline transmission from chimeras. |
Stable integration with consistent germline transmission. | Higher overall project cost compared to random transgenics and CRISPR. |
Single-copy insertion reduces the risk of gene silencing. | Limited to the genetic background of available germline-competent ES cells. |
Multiple independent founders may be required to identify the desired expression pattern. |
You can bring your research vision to life with the Mouse Biology Program’s custom mouse model services. From designing tailored genetic modifications to delivering well-characterized models, we ensure precision, efficiency, and reliability at every step. Contact us today to discuss how our expertise can help you achieve your research goals.
Not seeing something you need? Contact Us